KONSEP UJARAN SERUAN DALAM BAHASA MINANGKABAU: SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBANGUNAN KARAKTER BANGSA

Leni Syafyahya

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to explain the forms and the distribution of the form and meaning of the utterance of the cry in the Minangkabau language. The method used in data collection, the method of referring and the method of ably. Data analysis method used is method of padan. In addition, the data analysis phase is also done ie editing and coding. Based on the analysis, Ujaran appeal in Minangkabau language has a complete form and form is not complete. The complete form is built on the same model as the interrogative utterances and uses the same unfiliar particles as the exclamation. Only a different intonation, here marked with an exclamation mark at the end of speech. The shape is not lengakp is a shortened form into an exclamation / interjection. The form can be understood in a context and an exclamation mark is placed directly after the interjection, which is usually placed at the beginning of the utterance. The interjections include the shouting, curse, swearing and calling of the two forms, there is a call to seek a friend who refers to a positive attitude and there is a call to seek an opponent that refers to a negative attitude. In addition, both complete and incomplete forms have donotative meanings and connotative and emotive meanings. The denotative meaning is contained in the expression of the complete form and form of shout and form of attention. However, the incomplete form of screaming and calling attention sometimes also means emotive connotative and meaning. the meaning of the meaning depends on the context it enters. The expression of the call for incomplete forms of curse and curse is always meaningful connotative.

Keywords: speech, form, meaning, and Minangkabau


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alieva, N. F. et al.1991. Bahasa Indonesia Deskripsi dan Teori. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Ayub, Asni. dkk.1992.Tata Bahasa Minangkabau. Jakarta : Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembanagan Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan dan kebudayaan.

Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 1985. Sosiologi Bahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Aslinda. 2002.Tinjauan Sosisopragmatik “Kato Nan Ampek” Dalam Bahasa Minangkabau. Laporan Penelitian. Padang: Universitas Andalas.

Batuah. A. Dt. 1965. Tambo Alam Minangkabau Payakumbuh : Pt Limbagao.

Chaer, Abdul dan Agustina,Leoni. 1995. Sosiolinguistik. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian danKajian. Bandung : Eresco.

Halim, Abdul Hanafi. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa. Batusangkara: STAIN

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 1993. Kamus linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.

Marsono, dan Paina Pratama. 2002. Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: SABDA.

Medan, Tamsin 1980. Geografi Dialek Bahasa Minangkabau. Jakarta : Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Moleong, Lexy J. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

______________. 2007. Metodologi penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moussay, Gerard. 1998. Tata Bahasa Minangkabau. Terj. Hidayat Rahayu S. Jakarta : EFFEO University of Leiden.

Nababan, P.W.J. 1991. SosiolinguistikSuatu Pengantar. Jakarta : PT Gramedia.

Navis, A.A. 1984. Alam Terkembang Jadi Guru. Jakarta. Pustaka Grafiti.

Sopiani, Ahmad. 2008. “ Orang Besar Dibentuk Kata-Kata Positif’ dalam http://nasruni.wordpress.com.

Subroto, D. Edi. 1992. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Linguistik Struktural. Ed. 1. Surakarta : Sebelas Maret University Press.

Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta : Duta Wacana University Press.

Syafyahya, Leni. 2015. Kuasa Masyarakat Atas Bahasa. Padang: SURI

------------------2013.” Watak Kato dalam Ujaran Seruan Bahasa Minangkabau: Sebagai Cerminan Perilaku Barbahasa Masyarakat Minangkabau”.Prosiding Seminar Internasional ISOL 2. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Univeritas Andalas.

---------------------2008. “ Ujaran Seruan dalam Bahasa Minangkabau di Kabupaten Agam”. Laporan Penelitian. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya.

Syafyahya, Leni dkk. 2000. Kata Sapaan Bahasa Minangkabau di Kabupaten Agam. Jakarta : Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Spolsky, Bernard. 2003. Sociolinguistics. Oxford : University Press

Suwito. 1982. Sosiolinguistik Teori dan Problema. Surakarta: Henary Offset.

Toeah, Datoek. 1976. Tambo Alam Minangkabau. Bukittinggi : CV Pustaka Indonesia.

Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1992. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Second Edition. New York : Basil Blackwell.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/puitika.13.2.174--185.2017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Puitika



Puitika | ISSN: 2580-6009 (Online) 

Published by Program Studi Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Andalas
Email: puitika@hum.unand.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License