Abstract
This research studies about discourse usedby teachers in Ganesha Operation (GO) Sumbar in their facebook’s status about welcoming new year of 2014. It is interesting to be analyzed because every discoursehas one function. Moreover, the fact found in field was one discourse has more than one function.
Methods and techniques used there are three. (1) Methods and techniques of data collection. The method used is the methods and techniques used refer to is the techniquesee, technical note, and interview techniques. (2) Methods and techniques of data analysis. The method used is the method match (match referential, translational, orthographic, and pragmatic. The basic technique used is the technique Segment Element Determinants (PUP) and subsequent techniques are Contacts Appeal of discernment (HBM). (3) Techniques and methods of presentation of the results of data analysis used, namely formal and informal methods.
This study also resulted in a finding of speech acts, especially in terms of the function of speech. Apparently, the speech was not only contains the speech function, but more than one function of speech. Examples of speech it is data (1) not only contains the function to inform, but also insinuated, the data (2) not only inform, but also to express satisfaction, the data (3) not only inform but also revealeda complaint, the data (4) not only inform, but also in the form of a hope, and data (5) not only inform, but also banned.
Â
Keywords: speech acts, status, and facebook
References
Carr, Caleb T,. dkk. 2012. “Speech Acts Within Facebook Status Message.†Journals of Language and Social Psychology, Vol 31 No. 2, diakses melalui www.jls.sagepup.com pada 4 April 2014.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. (Ed. Ketiga). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hidlir, Lalu Muhammad, dkk. 2013. “Tindak Tutur Pengawas dalam Kegiatan Supervisi Akademik pada Guru SMA di Kabupaten Lombok Timur Tahun 2012/2013.†E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Volume 2 tahun 2013, diakses melalui https://pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/ pada 1 September 2014.
Ilyas, Sanaa dan Qamar Khushi. 2012. “Facebook Status Updates:A Speech Act Analysis.†Journals SAVAP Vol 3, No 2, diakses melalui www.journals.savap.org.pk pada 1 April 2014.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. (Penerjemah Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.
Mustikawati, Diyah Atiek. 2013. “Tindak Tutur pada Up Date Status Facebook Dosen dan Mahasiswa di UM Ponorogo.†Laporan Penelitian, diakses melalaui www.libraryponorogo.com pada 24 September 2014.
Nadar, F.X. 2009. Pragmatik dan Penelitian Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Revita, Ike. 2013. Pragmatik: Kajian Tindak Tutur Permintaan Lintas Bahasa. Padang: Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Andalas.
Sudaryanto. 1988. Metode Linguistik: ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
Wijana, I Dewa Putu. 1996. Dasar-dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta:Andi.
Puitika publishes its articles under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, with copyright held by the author(s). This means anyone can copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and Puitika, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
If accepted, authors will receive a Letter of Acceptence (LoA).